The Impact of Spatial Organization in Shared Offices on Users’ Functional and Perceptual Evaluations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16932711Keywords:
Co-working Offices, Interior Space, Organization, User ExperienceAbstract
This study aims to examine the relationship between the interior spatial organization of co-working spaces and user experience, which has become increasingly relevant in today’s work environments. The research takes COZONE, a co-working space located in Ankara, as a case study and evaluates user satisfaction, needs, and expectations regarding spatial layout and furnishing elements. A survey developed for this purpose was administered to 166 users. The findings indicate that female users assessed the spatial structure and flexibility more positively than their male counterparts and demonstrated greater sensitivity to aesthetic comfort components such as material, color, and texture. The placement of furniture and the diversity of work units were found to be equally sufficient across all user groups. The results highlight the necessity of addressing the diverse needs of different user profiles. Accordingly, a multidimensional interior design approach is proposed, one that incorporates flexible planning, sensitivity to user diversity, aesthetic quality, and privacy considerations.
References
Altman, I., 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Altınok, H., 2011. Ofis yapılarında iç mekân tasarımı ve kullanıcı memnuniyeti. İç Mimarlık Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1): 25–38.
Bouncken, R.B., Reuschl, A.J., 2018. Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1): 317–334.
Boyce, P.R., 2003. Lighting for offices: Guidelines for good lighting practice. IESNA Lighting Handbook.
Brill, M., Weidemann, S., Bostı, A., 2001. Disproving Widespread Myths About Workplace Design, Jasper, IN: Kimball International.
Cozone, 2020. COZONE's approach to coworking. (https://cozone.co/), (Accessed: 07.07.2020).
Çimen, O., 2008. Ofis mekânlarında değişen organizasyon yapısı ve iç mekân tasarımına etkileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul
Duffy, F., 1997. The New Office. London: Conran Octopus.
Field, A., 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Florida, R., 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.
Gifford, R., 2007. Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (4th ed.). Colville, WA: Optimal Books.
Hua, Y., 2010. A model of workplace environment satisfaction, collaboration experience, and perceived collaboration effectiveness: A survey of knowledge workers. Environment and Behavior, 42(1): 26–49.
Kim J., Dear R., Candido C., Zhang H., Arens E., 2013. Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality. Building Environment, 70: 245-256.
Kojo, I., Nenonen, S., 2016. Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland: What and how? Facilities, 34(5/6): 302–313.
Laing, A., 1991. The post-Fordist workplace: Issues of time and place. Facilities, 9(12): 13–18.
Laing, A., Bacevice, P.A., 2013. Co-working: A workplace paradigm shift. Work Design Magazine. (https://workdesign.com/2013/11/co-working-a-workplace-paradigm-shift/), (Accessed: 07.04.2025).
Marcus, C.C., Sarkissian, W., 1986. Housing as if People Mattered: Site Design Guidelines for the Planning of Medium-Density Family Housing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Merkel, J., 2015. Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 15(1): 121–139.
Nenonen, S., Kojo, I., 2013. Workplace management – Theory and practice. In K. Alexander & K. Price (Eds.), Managing organizational ecologies (pp. 77–90). Routledge.
Özkan, A., Yıldırım, K., 2016. Comparison of conventional and computer-aided drafting methods from the view of time and drafting quality. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(62) 239 - 254.
Spinuzzi, C., 2012. Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4): 399–441.
Sundstrom, E., Herbert, R.K., Brown, D.W., 1982. Privacy and communication in anopen-plan office: a case study. Environment and Behavior, 14(3): 379-392.
Sykes, J., 2014. Coworking: A transdisciplinary overview. Journal of Collaborative Work, 12(3): 39–54.
Vischer, J.C., 2007. The effects of the physical environment on job performance: Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health, 23(3): 175–184.
Yıldırım, K., Başkaya, A., Hidayetoğlu, M.L., 2005. Farklı sosyo ekonomik düzeye sahip blok-konut kullanıcılarının sabit iç donatım elemanlarından memnuniyeti. Politeknik Dergisi, 8(2): 189-197.
Yıldırım, K., Hidayetoğlu, M. L., 2008. Mekân yerleşimi ve kullanıcı algısı ilişkisi. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 4(2): 25–33.
Yıldırım, K., Akalın, A., 2009. Gender differences in the perception of space quality in offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1): 35–44.
Yıldırım, K., Uzun, O., 2010. The effects of space quality of dormitory rooms on functional and perceptual performance of users: Zübeyde Hanım Sorority. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(4): 519-530.
Yıldırım, K., Cağatay, K., Hidayetoğlu, M.L., 2015. The effect of age, gender and education level on customer evaluations of retail furniture store atmospheric attributes. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 43(8): 712-726.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ISPEC International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
