Theoretical Perspectives on Aesthetic Value and Beauty in Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19262499Keywords:
Beauty, Qualities, Harmony, Unity in Multiplicity, ExpressionAbstract
This text posits that beauty is not merely a subjective judgment, but is grounded in objective qualities inherent in objects. Every entity we designate as beautiful or ugly possesses certain values, both formal and conceptual (content-related). Beauty emerges from the interaction of these two main elements. The objective qualities of beauty are examined under two primary headings: Content-related Qualities and Formal Qualities. Content-related Qualities refer to the essential values an object must embody. These are identified as: Conformity to Idea, Kind, or Type, Perfection/Competence, Vibrancy (Livelines), and Expression. For an entity to be considered beautiful, it must conform to its proper kind, type, and consequently its Idea; it must exhibit a maturity approaching flawlessness, both formally and conceptually; and it must possess an expression that evokes active, meaningful, and honorable emotions in the observer. External-Formal Qualities encompass the visual and structural characteristics of an object. These qualities are categorized as: Proportion and Symmetry, which express the balanced and fitting arrangement of parts; Order and Harmony, which ensure a systematic, purposeful arrangement that provides peace and pleasure; and the principle of Unity in Multiplicity and Economy, which ensures all elements are efficiently utilized and focused on the main objective. The inherent human search for balance and order is the fundamental reason we find proportionate and harmonious structures beautiful. In works of art, the form, proportion, and symmetry reflecting the artist's intention enhance the power of the expression. Thus, beauty manifests itself in a complete, harmonious, vibrant, and purposeful entity that embodies all these objective qualities—the internal (conceptual) and external (formal), the measurable and the emotionally appealing.
References
Aygüneş, M. (2022). Güzellik Sadece Güç müdür? Derleme Tabanlı Bir Metafor İncelemesi. Dilbilim Araştırma Dergisi, (2).
Bozkurt, ejat. (1995). Sanat ve Estetik Kuramları.
Dabney Townsend. (2002). Estetiğe Giriş (Sabri Büyükdüvenci, Çev.). İmge Kitabevi.
Duygu, D. (2017). Sanat ve Tasarım etiği. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi, 6(30).
Ertan, G., & Emin Sansarcı. (2016). Görsel Sanatlarda Anlam ve Algı. Alternatif Yayınları.
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Aesthetık.
Francalanci, E. L. (2006). Nesnelerin Estetiği. Dost Kitabevi.
Ghykа, M. (1977). The Geometry of Art And Lıfe. Dover publıcatıons.
Güler, A. (2024). Kant’ın Estetik Anlayışı ve Bunun Edebi Eleştiriciliğe Etkisi. Söylem, 9(1).
Soysaldı, A. (2018). Kültür, Sanat ve Beşeriyet İlişkisi. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi.
Şimşek, İ. (2014). Antikçağdan Alman İdealizmine; Estetik Bir Değer Olarak Güzellik. Atatürk Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, (41).
Tokdil, E. (2021). Platon ve Aristoteles’in (Antik Yunan) Güzellik Anlayışı İle Giacometti Heykellerine Bakmak. Sanat ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(1).
Tunalı, İ. (2011). Estetik. Remzi Kitabevi.
Tunalı, İ. (2014). Kant Estetik’i ve Problemleri. Felsefe Arkivi, (14).
Turani, A. (1999). Çağdaş sanat felsefesi (3. bs). Remzi Kitabevi.
Yetkin, S. (1972). Estetik doktrinler. Bilgi Yayınevi.
Ziss, A. (2011). Estetik Gerçekliği Sanatsal Özümsemenin Bilimi (Yakup Şahan, Çev.). Hayalbaz Kitap.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ISPEC International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
