The Procyclicality of the Leverage Ratio in Turkish Banking Sector
Abstract views: 447 / PDF downloads: 251
Keywords:Turkish banking, banking assets, leverage ratio, leverage procyclicality, ARDL method
The leverage ratio is an important ratio, especially in the banking sector. In this study, it is researched whether the leverage ratio in Turkish banking sector is influenced from the procyclicality in the Turkish economy or how it is influenced. For this purpose, it is focused on leverage ratio and asset rate. As leverage ratio, it is used the external assets / total shareholder’s equity rate and also the total assets / total shareholder’s equity. As indicator for asset quality and change is used the total loans / total assets in Turkish banking sector. The relationship between the leverage ratios and the total loans / total asset rate in the condition of the all else being equal is analysed empirically as a whole with the quarterly banking cumulative sectorial data between 2007 - 2019 by ARDL ( Auto-Regresive Distributed Lag ) method for first time. According to the analysis results, there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between each of the leverage ratios and the total loans / total assets rate in the long run. It indicates that the leverage ratio is procyclical. It means that the leverage ratio increase and also the total loans / total assets rate in banking sector increase. To conclude, as the credit policy, it is recommended to determine countercyclical policy during financial expansion periods for the financial stability.
Adrian, T. and Shin, H.S. (2008a). “Liquidity and financial cycles”. BIS Working Paper no: 256.
Adrian, T. and Shin, H. S. (2008b). “Liquidity, monetary policy, and financial cycles”. Current issues in economics and finance, 14 (1).
Adrian, T. and Shin, H.S. (2010). “ Liquidity and leverage ”. Journal of financial intermediation, 19 (3), 418 - 437.
Athanasoglou, P. P., Daniilidis, I., and Delis, M. D. (2014). “ Bank procyclicality and output: Issues and policies ”. Journal of Economics and Business, 72, 58 - 83.
Avcı, E., and Çatak, Ç.(2016). “Determinants of Bank Capital Structure and Procyclicality of Leverage: an Empirical Analysis from Turkey”. Marmara Business Review, 1 (2), 41-57.
Baglioni, A., Beccalli, E., Boitani, A., and Monticini, A. (2013). “Is the leverage of European banks procyclical?”. Empirical Economics, 45 (3), 1251 - 1266.
Basel Committee (2014). “Basel III leverage ratio framework and disclosure requirements”. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs270.pdf on 14.05.2021.
BIS (2008). “Addressing financial system procyclicality: a possible framework”. Note for the FSF Working Group on Market and Institutional Resilience. Retrieved from https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_0904e.pdf on 16.05.2021.
BIS (2009a). 2008 Annual Report ( 79th Annual Report ). Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2009e.pdf on 15.05.2021.
BIS (2009b). “The role of valuation and leverage in procyclicality”, CGSF Papers no: 34. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs34.pdf on 15.05.2021.
Binici, M. , and Köksal, B. (2012). “Is the leverage of Turkish banks procyclical?”. Central Bank Review, 12 (2), 11.
Çalışkan, A. (2011). “Leverage Behaviour of Turkish Banks: How Did They Escape the Global Crisis?”. Available at SSRN 2723867.
D’Hulster, K. (2009). “The Leverage Ratio”. Crisisresponse public policy for private sector. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/260961468158726436/pdf/530440BRI0Cris10Box345594B01PUBLIC1.pdf on 06.01.2021.
Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric Analysis. Maxwell Macmillan International.
Hardouvelis, G. A. (2010). “Actions for a less procyclical financial system”. Economy & Markets, Eurobank Research, 5 (5) , 1 - 33. Retrieved from https://hardouvelis.gr/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ECONOMYMARKETSSeptember2010.pdf on 09.04.2021.
Hasan, A., and Nasır, Z. M. (2008). “Macroeconomic Factors and Equity Prices: An Empirical Investigation by Using ARDL Approach”. The Pakistan Development Review, 501-513. Retrieved from http://thepdr.pk/pdr/index.php/pdr/article/viewFile/2283/2283 on 08.04.2021.
Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sorensen, B., and Yesiltas, S. (2012). “ Leverage across firms, banks, and countries ”. Retrieved from NBER Working Paper 17354. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w17354/w17354.pdf on 06.01.2021.
Kaya, E. and Köksal,Y.(2018). “Türk Bankacılık Sisteminde Kaldıraç Döngüselliği”. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (2), 7 - 20.
Kaya, E., and Köksal, Y. (2019). “Kaldıraç ve Döngüsellik: Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Bir Uygulama”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (2), 331 - 346.
Landau, J. P.(2009, May). “Procyclicality: what it means and what could be done”. In remarks at the Bank of Spain’s conference on Procyclicality and the Role of Financial Regulation, Madrid, May. Retrieved from http://eia.libis.lt:8080/archyvas/viesas/20091230051056/http://www.banque-france.fr/gb/instit/telechar/discours/2009/090504.pdf on 05.04.2021.
Mert, M. and Çağlar, A.E. (2019). Eviews ve Gauss Uygulamalı Zaman Serileri Analizi. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Narayan, P. K. (2005). “The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”. Applied economics, 37 (17), 1979 - 1990. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paresh-Narayan/publication/24075564_The_Saving_and_Investment_Nexus_for_China_Evidence_From_Cointegration_Tests/links/568ab37a08ae051f9afa6bb7/The-Saving-and-Investment-Nexus-for-China-Evidence-From-Cointegration-Tests.pdf on 27.01.2020.
Nijathaworn, B. (2009). “Rethinking procyclicality–what is it now and what can be done?” In Presentation by Mr Bandid Nijathaworn, Deputy Governor of the Bank of Thailand, at the BIS/FSI-EMEAP High Level Meeting on “Lessons Learned from the Financial Crisis–An International and Asian Perspective”, Tokyo (Vol. 30).
Nkoro, E. and Uko, A. K. (2016). “Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration technique: application and interpretation”. Journal of Statistical and Econometric methods, 5 (4), 63-91. Retrieved from http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JSEM/Vol%205_4_3.pdf on 28.01.2020.
Nuño, G., and Thomas, C. (2017). “Bank leverage cycles”. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9 (2), 32-72. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/153957/1/ecbwp1524.pdf on 08.01.2021.
Özdamar, G. (2015). “Türkiye Ekonomisinde Döviz Kuru Geçiş Etkisi: ARDL-Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı Bulguları”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (32), 66 - 97.
Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (1998). “An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis”. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371 - 413.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”. Journal of applied econometrics, 16 (3), 289 - 326.
Ouattara, B.(2004a). “Modelling the long run determinants of private investment in Senegal (No. 04 / 05)”. Credit Research Paper.
Ouattara, B. (2004b). The impact of project aid and programme aid inflows on domestic savings: A case study of Côte d’Ivoire. In Centre for the Study of African Economies Conference on Growth, Poverty Reduction and Human Development in Africa.
TBB (2021). Bankalarımız 2020. Yayın no: 339. Retrieved from https://www.tbb.org.tr/Content/Upload/Dokuman/7766/Bankalarimiz_2020.pdf on 15.05.2021.
Terzioglu, M., and Demir, Y. (2015). “Leverage Procyclical of Turkish Deposit Banks”. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 2 (4). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jefa/issue/32437/360752 on 06.01.2021.
Wu, Y., and Hu, R. (2017). “A Study of The Leverage Pro-cyclical Behavior and Asymmetry of Commercial Banks in China”. Revista de Cercetare ŞiInterventie Sociala, 59 (12), 136 - 152. Retrieved from https://www.rcis.ro/images/documente/rcis59_10.pdf on 07.01.2021.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 ISPEC International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.